![]() ![]() These include, but are not restricted to, greater incidence of psychiatric ( Dag, 1999 Peltzer, 2002), depressive ( Thalbourne and French, 1995), and manic ( Thalbourne and French, 1995) symptoms. Historically, studies have reported positive correlations between belief in the paranormal and psychopathological outcomes ( Thalbourne and Storm, 2019 Liu et al., 2021). These outcomes indicated that belief in the paranormal is not necessarily non-adaptive, and that further research is required to identify the conditions under which belief in the paranormal is maladaptive. Higher Paranormal Belief, however, was not necessarily associated with lower psychological adjustment and reduced well-being (Profile 2). ![]() Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) found that sub-groups with higher psychopathology scores (Profiles 1 and 3) reported lower well-being. Latent profile analysis identified four distinct sub-groups: Profile 1, high Paranormal Belief and Psychopathology ( n = 688) Profile 2, high Paranormal Belief and Unusual Experiences moderate Psychopathology ( n = 800) Profile 3, moderate Paranormal Belief and Psychopathology ( n = 846) and Profile 4, low Paranormal Belief and Psychopathology ( n = 2070). A United Kingdom-based, general sample of 4,402 respondents completed self-report measures assessing paranormal belief, psychopathology (schizotypy, depression, manic experience, and depressive experience), and well-being (perceived stress, somatic complaints, and life satisfaction). This study examined variations in well-being as a function of the interaction between paranormal belief and psychopathology-related constructs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |